Carwyn Jones blogs
Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Carwyn 'I'm the next First Minister Jones' has a blog.

I was talking to someone at Welsh Assembly Communications last week and not even they were aware of this.

Unfortunately, Carwyn blogs from the Alun Pugh school of tedium rather than the Glyn Davies school of controversy.

Yesterday, for example he blogged on the 'Warmer, Safer Homes Surgery'.

Yawn.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Blamerbell @ 9:12 am,

6 Comments:

At 11:02 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd be surprised if Carwyn knew he had a blog - this has got spotty researcher written all over it. Which may explain the dullness.

What are the odds on Carwyn taking over as Welsh Labour leader from Rhodri in 2009 - or sooner if Rhodri has a 'mare in May? Who else is there - Davidson (too posh), Edwina (not good on telly), Andrew Davies (greyer than a Port Talbot sunset). The rest have trouble walking and chewing gum...

 
At 11:29 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Carwyn hasn't got a blog he's got two!

Carwyn's Newspaper Columns

All his(?) great writings in one place!

 
At 12:46 pm, Blogger Blamerbell said...

"I'd be surprised if Carwyn knew he had a blog - this has got spotty researcher written all over it."

Exactly. Which is why it's so incredibly dull.

 
At 3:29 pm, Blogger Peter D Cox said...

Don't assume that the boringness comes from a poor, hapless researcher - many are proto-journalists doing servitude with politicians to make an honest crust. No, this might be the authentic voice. As for his columns, the Bridgend & Valleys Recorder and the Glamorgan Gazette must be overjoyed at the additional exposure. I note btw that neither blog seems to have yet attracted any comments.

 
At 8:53 pm, Blogger Glyn Davies said...

What's this about 'school ocontroversy'. You leave me no choice but to go and post a seriously partisan post attacking Peter Hain as a defence.

 
At 10:44 pm, Blogger Blamerbell said...

"You leave me no choice but to go and post a seriously partisan post attacking Peter Hain as a defence"

Surely, it would be more controversial if you were to defend him?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home